Could the Coalition steal Labor’s clothes on optional preferences?

I’m in Crikey again today on optional preferential voting, responding to this article by Christian Kerr in this morning’s Australian. It’s mostly about domestic politics, but I think the conclusion has wider implications:

If there’s a constant theme in the history of electoral law in Australia (and most other countries as well), it’s that change is driven by perceived political interest, not by principle. Shifts to more democratic outcomes happen when a major party thinks that they will work to its advantage – as, for example, with the introduction of PR for the Senate by the Chifley government.

It’s just possible that this might be one of those cases.

If you’re not a subscriber (but of course you should be – it’s great value!), you can get the gist of my view, with some more of the history, in this piece from 2010.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.